May 14, 2008
The premise is straightforward: Jacobs lives an entire year following biblical law as closely as possible. Hilarity ensues, but it’s mostly foreseeable hilarity. The conflict between fundamentalistic literalism and more metaphorical interpretations. The bizarre anachronisms. The marginalized situation for women. I could see it coming.
Not that this book is not worthwhile. Jacobs does legitimately seem to self-reflect, and he’s remarkably tolerant of a wide spectrum of beliefs. In the end, not much changes with him but he does have sensitivity and understanding.
The writing is good in that it wasn’t particularly assertive, letting the anecdotes unfold with their own timbre. I appreciated that.
I sure spent a lot of time feeling sorry for his wife, who endured the more extreme rules (for example: no contact whatsoever whilst menstruating, honoring the edict of “impurity”). She deserves an award.
Get the Books
Read my Reviews
Hi, found your blog on LT. I’m only just making my way around to everyone’s blogs. I’ve been thinking about picking this up, but now after your review I’m not sure I will. Thanks for the heads up.I look forward to more of your reviews :)
Hi – I also found your blog at LT and wanted to say hello. I read this about a month ago and had much the same reaction – boy, his wife really loves him!
Hi another LTer here, I have this book on my wishlist as read his encyclopedia one. I read some excerpts in the paper and felt sorry for his wife, although I belive she got her own back at A Certain Time…
Happy reading!
His earlier book – which describes what happens when he vows to read the entire encyclopedia cover to cover within a year – is well worth the read. I’ve got a copy if you’re interested…!